Pattio wrote:First, I think it's important to acknowledge that motorpsycho believes this movie has bad writing. This movie has bad writing, and this has been observed by motorpsycho, and this has been acknowledged by me, and this is so. Further, I think it is important to further acknowledge that motorpsycho found the writing of the script of this movie to be poorly written. I acknowledge here that it is the opinion of motorpsycho that this movie has writing, and that it is poor, and that this is a disappointment and that this makes the movie less than a good movie, and that a person interested in seeing this movie should go in with the understanding that motorpsycho regards the writing of this movie to be poor. I've done what I can to cover the bases here, so I hope that those reading this will choose to go see this movie, and see it in a theater, and see it in 3D if possible, even with the understanding, stated above, and worth noting, that motorpsycho considers the writing to have been poor. Thank you for your time.
Pattio wrote:Auburndale is not far from me. 12ci are you familiar with that group/event? Worth checking out?
xtian wrote:haven't seen it yet, I like the cars but, how's the writing ?
Pattio wrote:Calamari you failed to acknowledge that the writing is poor. Please acknowledge that or the poor-finder will be forced to post again to get his poor message across.
motorpsycho67 wrote:Let it go already.
Pattio wrote:Just so we're clear here, I waited 30 years for this movie and it's a good and noteworthy movie. If you choose to set your marker on being a critic of this movie, so be it. You have countered every. single. post. On this movie with your negativity. Every. Single. Post.
Pattio wrote:The guy who won't let it go is the guy who won't let it go. He's in the mirror.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 1 guest