LOGIN ISSUES
Because I've presently got technical incompetences with the board, password resets presently do not work automatic like.
If you can't login, click here please.
Show
If you have any problem logging in, please don't bother waiting and get in touch. Email right to the usual address (admin at...), use the contact form (bottom of index and most other pages), post in the Midget Circus, or message me directly on Facebook.
I should get the message within a few hours, but under rare circumstances, it might take me a day.

If you can login no problem, but you wish to avoid problem, try checking the "Remember Me" box where you login. I've meddled with the settings there, so even if you return here only once every couple of weeks, it should remember you fine. Provided you have cookies enabled.

If it won't remember you, and you want to be sure any failure to remember is actually such and not just an oops, please read the following (click the bar to make it "show").
Important infos about cookies
Show
To be remembered, you must have cookies enabled in your browser. Some people prefer using "private" browsing mode - which precludes cookies being placed on your device in the first place.
Some people use regular browsing mode, but may have chosen to disable all cookies in their settings. Sometimes, these people will end up tearing their hair out because a lot of websites just don't work at all, like many online stores, as many e-commerce platforms don't do bugger all without using cookies.
Me, I've got "Self-Destructing Cookies" plugins in my various browsers. Which lets me accept all cookies everywhere, smug in the knowledge that they will be deleted the instant I close that browser tab. I can even set it to delete the cookies only when I close the whole browser window, which is helpful with online stores.
And I can whitelist sites like the board, so the plugin doesn't mess with those cookies at all.

And you must use the same browser, on the same machine. Unless you're using something like a cookie manager that syncs to all your devices and things, your apple browser on your ipad won't have the delicious cookies chrome has on your PC. And unless google now manages cookies between your devices (who knows what the fuck they do), even chrome on your Android won't have the same cookies as chrome on your notebook, or chrome on your other Android.
If you wish to discuss this, follow this link.

SECURITY WHATNOW?
Once upon a when, we've had a data breach (maybe).
Click here if you don't know what that's about.
Show
If you've visited the forum at any time after November 18, 2020, you will have seen the message about a supposed data breach that may have exposed passwords. I know you will have seen it because, until today, there was a big general announcement right at the top of the everything.
Seeing how it's been nearly 18 months since that, with no further alarms getting rung, and how everyone has had 758,214 opportunities to take a minute to think about the security of their passwords, I've taken that notice down.
Follow this link for all the info that has transpired about the whole mess.

You may dismiss this message by clicking the dark X in the top right hand corner. You may have to mouse-over to see it. I assure you it's there.

BLADE RUNNER "BLACK LOTUS"

La geek forumo - Y fforwm geek - Otakufōramu.
Post Reply
User avatar
Jaeger
Baron von Scrapple
Location: NoVA
Contact:

BLADE RUNNER "BLACK LOTUS"

Post by Jaeger » Sat Jul 24, 2021 8:25 am

Y'all see this?



I'm weary of CGI animation but I'm a sucker for more Blade Runner.

We'll see if they can actually capture the humanity of the original in a totally digital format.

--Jaeger


Bigshankhank wrote:The world is a fucking wreck, but there is still sunshine in some places. Go outside and look for it.
<<NEUTIQUAM ERRO>>
2018 Indian Scout -- "Lilah"

User avatar
DerGolgo
Zaphod's Zeitgeist
Location: Potato

Re: BLADE RUNNER "BLACK LOTUS"

Post by DerGolgo » Sat Jul 24, 2021 11:11 pm

Jaeger wrote:
Sat Jul 24, 2021 8:25 am

We'll see if they can actually capture the humanity of the original in a totally digital format.

--Jaeger
Considering the subject matter, that's a rather interesting conundrum, isn't it.
If there were absolutely anything to be afraid of, don't you think I would have worn pants?

I said I have a big stick.

motorpsycho67
Double-dip Diogenes
Location: City of Angels

Re: BLADE RUNNER "BLACK LOTUS"

Post by motorpsycho67 » Mon Jul 26, 2021 5:56 pm

Love me some Blade Runner, but CGI animation doesn't work for me.
'75 Honda CB400F
'82 Kawalski GPz750
etc.

User avatar
Jaeger
Baron von Scrapple
Location: NoVA
Contact:

Re: BLADE RUNNER "BLACK LOTUS"

Post by Jaeger » Thu Jul 29, 2021 11:26 am

From what I've seen the animation is... meh?

But I agree, I'm weary of CGI. It's especially jarring with something like Blade Runner, which is (IMHO) at least partly an analysis of how technology makes us less human. Watching digitally generated people run around a digitally generated world with dead CGI eyes... eeech, i dunno.

I'll give it a go but I have reservations. If they story is good enough I'll cut them slack, otherwise they're just playing off old farts like me (us) who're primed to glom on to anything from our youth. :L

--Jaeger
Bigshankhank wrote:The world is a fucking wreck, but there is still sunshine in some places. Go outside and look for it.
<<NEUTIQUAM ERRO>>
2018 Indian Scout -- "Lilah"

User avatar
DerGolgo
Zaphod's Zeitgeist
Location: Potato

Re: BLADE RUNNER "BLACK LOTUS"

Post by DerGolgo » Sat Jul 31, 2021 12:23 am

Jaeger wrote:
Thu Jul 29, 2021 11:26 am
But I agree, I'm weary of CGI. It's especially jarring with something like Blade Runner, which is (IMHO) at least partly an analysis of how technology makes us less human. Watching digitally generated people run around a digitally generated world with dead CGI eyes... eeech, i dunno.
That's an interesting point, actually.
We've seen those themes explored with nothing but real, living eyes, in OG Blade Runner. Then with a mix of real, living eyes and one pair of not-quite living eyes, in Blade Runner 2049. What'shisname had a relationship with a bit of software that he could only ever see or hear, but never touch, and that "looked" at him through the eyes of a hologram.

So doing it >all< with dead eyes. Cutting the living out of it, going whole-hog for the synthetic. Might be interesting.
It can only ever be a canvas to paint the story and things on. But if that canvas wasn't damn important, you for example, @Jaeger, wouldn't be so wary of this new one, would you.
If there were absolutely anything to be afraid of, don't you think I would have worn pants?

I said I have a big stick.

Post Reply