Acident data, useful or no?

The place to come if you've been with us for years or it's your first time here. General yakking about anything motorcycle related. Think of it as the internet coffeehouse for the UTMC.
Post Reply
User avatar
0l4fderstout
Maltov Rattlecan
Location: Grand Rapids, MI

Acident data, useful or no?

Post by 0l4fderstout » Sun Apr 07, 2019 3:29 pm

Interesting article over on RevZilla:

https://www.revzilla.com/common-tread/a ... le-crashes
Ask the doc: What we don't know about motorcycle crashes

From the Hurt Report of the 1970s to recent studies that have drawn hundreds of reader comments here at Common Tread, there have been many attempts to study motorcycle crashes. And yet, there's still a lot we don't know.

While there is a lot of data collected on us all the time, that doesn't mean we have the data we need to understand how and why motorcyclists crash, and what the repercussions are.

For example, hospitals — and trauma centers, in particular — collect lots of data about those who are injured. Verified trauma centers also generally upload precise pieces of data into a national database called the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB), and other data regarding inpatient care into another database, the Trauma Quality Improvement Project (TQIP). TQIP is related to the same kind of databank that looks at more general surgical outcomes, the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP), which was birthed by the Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Project (VASQIP).



Post Reply